Re: [FWP] Re: Neat or horrid?

[Ronald J Kimball <rjk@linguist.dartmouth.edu>]

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 08:35:12PM +0000, David L. Nicol wrote:
> One and a half percent slowdown die to using && rather than ? is
> mystifying to me.  Could it be that && is slower on 5.005_03?

I doubt that the 1.5% difference is significant, especially since when I
ran this Benchmark, there was a 3% difference _in the other direction_.

Ronald

==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl?  Well, if you insist...
==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_
====   unsubscribe